Posts

Why the Child Maintenance Service Fails the Value for Money Test

Public spending in the UK is not assessed in vague terms. It is measured against a clear standard used by the National Audit Office: Economy – is money being spent carefully? Efficiency – are resources being used well? Effectiveness – is the system achieving its intended outcomes? These are not optional benchmarks. They are the basis on which Government systems are judged. 1. Economy – The Cost of the System The Child Maintenance Service costs approximately: £116 million per year This is justified on the basis that the system ensures financial support reaches children. But cost alone does not determine value. What matters is what that spending delivers. 2. Efficiency – The Cost of the Outcomes Freedom of Information data has identified: 35 suicides among paying parents in approximately six months Using Parliament’s estimate of £1.67 million per suicide , this equates to: ~£117 million per year That is broadly equivalent to the annual cost of running the service. This is not a claim ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is the Child Maintenance Service Value for Money?

 Public services are not judged on cost alone. They are judged on whether they deliver value. Under the framework used by the National Audit Office, public spending must be assessed against three key principles: Economy – is money being spent carefully? Efficiency – are resources being used well? Effectiveness – is the system achieving its intended outcomes? These are the standards applied across Government. The question is whether the Child Maintenance Service meets them. The Cost of the System The Child Maintenance Service costs approximately: £116 million per year to operate This is public money, funded by taxpayers, and justified on the basis that it supports children by ensuring financial maintenance is paid. The Cost of the Outcomes Recent analysis based on Freedom of Information data has identified: 35 suicides among paying parents in a six-month period Using Parliament’s estimate of £1.67 million per suicide , this equates to: ~£117 million per year That is broadly equi...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Double Cost of CMS: £117 Million in Deaths — and the Hidden Cost to the Taxpayer

Image
  Parliament has previously estimated the economic cost of suicide at approximately £1.67 million per death. This figure, cited in a 2016 Health Committee report, is based on earlier data and has not been updated for inflation. More recent studies use different methodologies and often describe their estimates as “conservative,” meaning they are not directly comparable. What is clear, however, is that the £1.67 million figure represents a baseline rather than a maximum, and the true cost today is likely to be significant. That cost is not abstract. It includes: Lost employment and tax revenue NHS and emergency service costs Coroner and legal processes The long-term impact on families and society One suicide costs the taxpayer £1.6 million Screenshot from Parliamentary Health Committee report (2016) referencing the estimated economic cost of suicide. See paragraph 16 The FOI Evidence A Freedom of Information response has confirmed: 35 suicides among CMS paying parents in approximate...
Post a Comment
Read more

Has the Burden of Proof Been Reversed in CMS Cases? (Article 6 & Magna Carta Explained)

Image
  Short Answer In law, the burden of proof should remain with the party asserting a debt. However, in the Child Maintenance Service (CMS) system, the structure of decision-making and enforcement can create situations where individuals feel they must challenge or disprove arrears that have already been asserted. 👉 The issue is not whether the legal principle has changed, but whether it is always applied effectively in practice. The Magna Carta still has the force of law under the 1297 enactment here you see clause 29 which is now recognised in Article 6 ECHR and Article 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998 Magna Carta 1297 clause 29 is still on the statute books The principle of fair process has deep roots in English law. Magna Carta 1297, clause 29 provides: “No Freeman shall be taken or imprisoned… nor will we deny or delay right or justice.” This provision is often cited as an early expression of the principle that legal rights and obligations should be determined through a fa...
Post a Comment
Read more

Are CMS Liability Order Hearings Just a Rubber Stamp? (What the Evidence Shows)

Image
  Immediate Point If the Child Maintenance Service applies for a liability order, many people assume the court will examine whether the arrears are correct. 👉 In reality, the position is more limited. The court’s role is not to recalculate the amount owed. It is to consider whether the legal conditions for enforcement are met. What the Court Is (and Is Not) Deciding At a liability order hearing: the court considers whether payments are due and unpaid it checks that the correct process has been followed 👉 But it does not re-examine the underlying calculation This reflects the legal structure of the system: disputes about the amount are handled through the CMS and tribunal process the court deals with enforcement of that amount How Hearings Are Often Listed in Practice In practice, liability order hearings are often listed in large groups. It is not unusual for multiple cases to be listed in the same session, sometimes involving a significant number of ap...
Post a Comment
Read more

What Happens at a CMS Liability Order Hearing in the UK?

  If you fall into arrears with the Child Maintenance Service (CMS), the case can escalate to court. This usually takes the form of a liability order hearing . But many people ask: 👉 What actually happens at a CMS liability order hearing? 👉 Can the court check if the arrears are correct? Understanding this process is critical—because it highlights how enforcement and disputes operate separately within the system . What Is a CMS Liability Order? A liability order is a legal step that allows the CMS to: formally recognise a debt as payable pursue stronger enforcement action apply for measures such as: bailiffs charging orders further court-based enforcement Once granted, it significantly increases the CMS’s ability to recover arrears. What Happens at the Hearing? A liability order hearing usually takes place in the magistrates’ court . At the hearing: The CMS presents the amount it says is owed The court considers whether: the amount has been ca...
Post a Comment
Read more

Should CMS Enforcement Be Paused When Arrears Are Disputed? (UK Law & Guidance Explained)

  A key question many parents ask is: Should the Child Maintenance Service (CMS) continue enforcement when arrears are disputed? On the surface, the system suggests that enforcement can proceed where payments are unpaid. However, when the official guidance and case law are examined more closely, a more complex picture emerges. The Official Position The Child Maintenance Service has a range of enforcement powers where payments are considered due and unpaid. These include: Deduction from Earnings Orders (DEOs) Deduction from bank accounts Liability orders through the courts Further legal enforcement measures 👉 In practice, individuals are generally expected to continue making payments even if they dispute the amount owed . The Decision-Making Framework (DMG Volume 7) The Decision Makers’ Guidance makes clear that enforcement decisions are not automatic. Decision Makers must: gather all relevant information consider all available evidence apply the law, i...
Post a Comment
Read more